Blog

Early in the new year, promises to reboot your health typically focus on diet, exercise, and weight loss. And by now you may have begun making changes — or at least plans — to reach those goals. But consider going beyond the big three.

Below are 10 often-overlooked, simple ideas to step up personal health and safety. And most won’t make you break a sweat.

Review your health portals

Your medical information is kept in electronic records. You have access to them through the patient portal associated with your doctor’s office. Set aside time to update portal passwords and peruse recent records of appointments, test results, and notes your doctor took during your visits.

“Many studies have shown that when patients review the notes, they remember far better what went on during interactions with their clinicians, take their medicines more effectively, and pick up on errors — whether it’s an appointment they forgot to make or something their doctor, nurse, or therapist got wrong in documenting an encounter,” says Dr. Tom Delbanco, the John F. Keane & Family Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and cofounder of the OpenNotes initiative, which led shared clinician notes to become the new standard of care.

Doing this can help you become more engaged in your care. “We know from numerous studies that engaged patients who share decisions with those caring for them have better outcomes,” he adds.

Ask about health insurance freebies

Your insurance plan may offer perks that can lead to better health, such as:

• weight loss cessation programs
• quit-smoking programs
• free or reduced gym memberships.

Some insurers even offer breastfeeding counseling and equipment. Call your insurance company or take a close look at their website to find out if there’s anything that would help you.

Get rid of expired medications

Scour your cabinets for expired or unneeded drugs, which pose dangers for you and others. Look for prescription and over-the-counter medications (pills, potions, creams, lotions, droppers, or aerosol cans) as well as supplements (vitamins, minerals, herbs).

Bring your finds to a drug take-back site, such as a drugstore or law enforcement office, or a medical waste collection site such as the local landfill.

As a last resort, toss medications into the trash, but only after mixing them with unappealing substances (such as cat litter or used coffee grounds) and placing the mixture in a sealable plastic bag or container.

Invest in new sneakers

The wrong equipment can sabotage any exercise routine, and for many people the culprit is a worn pair of sneakers. Inspect yours for holes, flattened arch support, and worn treads. New sneakers could motivate you to jazz up your walking or running routine.

For example, if it’s in the budget, buy a new pair of walking shoes with a wide toe box, cushy insoles, good arch support, a sturdy heel counter (the part that goes around your heel), stretchy uppers, and the right length — at least half an inch longer than your longest toe.

Cue up a new health app

There are more than 350,000 health apps geared toward consumer health. They can help you with everything from managing your medications or chronic disease to providing instruction and prompts for improving diet, sleep, or exercise routines, enhancing mental health, easing stress, practicing mindfulness, and more.

Hunt for apps that are free or offer a free trial period for a test drive. Look for good reviews, strong privacy guardrails, apps that don’t collect too much information from you, and those that are popular — with hundreds of thousands or millions of downloads.

Make a schedule for health screenings and visits

Is it time for a colonoscopy, mammogram, hearing test, prostate check, or comprehensive eye exam? Has it been a while since you had a dermatologist examine the skin on your whole body? Should you have a cholesterol test or other blood work — and when is a bone density test helpful?

If you’re not sure, call your primary care provider or any specialists on your health team to get answers.

Four more simple healthy steps

The list of steps you can take this year to benefit your health can be as long as you’d like it to be. Jot down goals any time you think of them.

Here are four solid steps to start you off:

• Take some deep breaths each day. A few minutes of daily slow, deep breathing can help lower your blood pressure and ease stress.
• Get a new pair of sunglasses if your old ones have worn lenses. Make sure the new pair has UV protection (a special coating) to block the sun’s ultraviolet (UV) light, which can cause eye damage and lead to permanent vision loss.
• Make a few lunch dates or phone dates with friends you haven’t seen in a while. Being socially connected wards off loneliness and isolation, which can help lower certain health risks.
• Do a deep cleaning on one room in your home per week. Dust and mold can trigger allergies, asthma, and even illness.

You don’t have to do all of these activities at once. Just put them on your to-do list, along with the larger resolutions you’re working on. Now you’ll have a curated list of goals of varying sizes. The more goals you reach, the better you’ll feel. And that will make for a very healthy year, indeed.

About the Author

Heidi Godman, Executive Editor, Harvard Health Letter

Heidi Godman is the executive editor of the Harvard Health Letter. Before coming to the Health Letter, she was an award-winning television news anchor and medical reporter for 25 years. Heidi was named a journalism fellow … See Full Bio View all posts by Heidi Godman

About the Reviewer

Howard E. LeWine, MD, Chief Medical Editor, Harvard Health Publishing; Editorial Advisory Board Member, Harvard Health Publishing

Dr. Howard LeWine is a practicing internist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Chief Medical Editor at Harvard Health Publishing, and editor in chief of Harvard Men’s Health Watch. See Full Bio View all posts by Howard E. LeWine, MD

Nantucket, a beautiful, 14-mile-long island off the coast of Massachusetts, has a 40-point resiliency plan to help withstand the buffeting seas surrounding it as climate change takes a toll. Perhaps we can all benefit from creating individual resilience plans to help handle the big and small issues that erode our sense of well-being. But what is resilience and how do you cultivate it?

What is resilience?

Resilience is a psychological response that helps you adapt to life’s difficulties and seek a path forward through challenges.

“It’s a flexible mindset that helps you adapt, think critically, and stay focused on your values and what matters most,” says Luana Marques, an associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School.

While everyone has the ability to be resilient, your capacity for resilience can take a beating over time from chronic stress, perhaps from financial instability or staying in a job you dislike. The longer you’re in that situation, the harder it becomes to cope with it.

Fortunately, it’s possible to cultivate resilience. To do so, it helps to exercise resiliency skills as often as possible, even for minor stressors. Marques recommends the following strategies.

Shift your thoughts

In stressful situations, try to balance out your thoughts by adopting a broader perspective. “This will help you stop using the emotional part of your brain and start using the thinking part of your brain. For example, if you’re asking for a raise and your brain says you won’t get it, think about the things you’ve done in your job that are worthy of a raise. You’ll slow down the emotional response and shift your mindset from anxious to action,” Marques says.

Approach what you want

“When you’re anxious, stressed, or burned out, you tend to avoid things that make you uncomfortable. That can make you feel stuck,” Marques says. “What you need to do is get out of your comfort zone and take a step toward the thing you want, in spite of fear.”

For example: If you’re afraid of giving a presentation, create a PowerPoint and practice it with colleagues. If you’re having conflict at home, don’t walk away from your partner — schedule time to talk about what’s making you upset.

Align actions with your values

“Stress happens when your actions are not aligned with your values — the things that matter most to you or bring you joy. For example, you might feel stressed if you care most about your family but can’t be there for dinner, or care most about your health but drink a lot,” Marques says.

She suggests that you identify your top three values and make sure your daily actions align with them. If being with family is one of the three, make your time with them a priority — perhaps find a way to join them for a daily meal. If you get joy from a clean house, make daily tidying a priority.

Tips for success

Practice the shift, approach, and align strategies throughout the week. “One trick I use is looking at my calendar on Sunday and checking if my actions for the week are aligned with my values. If they aren’t, I try to change things around,” Marques says.

It’s also important to live as healthy a lifestyle as possible, which will help keep your brain functioning at its best.

Healthy lifestyle habits include:

• getting seven to nine hours of sleep per night
• following a healthy diet, such as a Mediterranean-style diet
• aiming for at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity activities (such as brisk walking) each week — and adding on strength training at least twice a week
• if you drink alcohol, limiting yourself to no more than one drink per day for women and two drinks per day for men
• not smoking
• staying socially connected, whether in person, by phone or video calls, social media, or even text messages.

Need resilience training?

Even the best athletes have coaches, and you might benefit from resilience training.

Consider taking an online course, such as this one developed by Luana Marques. Or maybe turn to a therapist online or in person for help. Look for someone who specializes in cognitive behavioral therapy, which guides you to redirect negative thoughts to positive or productive ones.

Just don’t put off building resilience. Practicing as you face day-to-day stresses will help you learn skills to help navigate when dark clouds roll in and seas get rough.

About the Author

Heidi Godman, Executive Editor, Harvard Health Letter

Heidi Godman is the executive editor of the Harvard Health Letter. Before coming to the Health Letter, she was an award-winning television news anchor and medical reporter for 25 years. Heidi was named a journalism fellow … See Full Bio View all posts by Heidi Godman

About the Reviewer

Howard E. LeWine, MD, Chief Medical Editor, Harvard Health Publishing; Editorial Advisory Board Member, Harvard Health Publishing

Dr. Howard LeWine is a practicing internist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Chief Medical Editor at Harvard Health Publishing, and editor in chief of Harvard Men’s Health Watch. See Full Bio View all posts by Howard E. LeWine, MD

Cheers! Salud! Prost!

Drinking to one’s health is a common tradition. But it may also be self-defeating: the alcohol that’s part of many toasts can actually harm your health.

Of course, alcohol consumption extends well past toasts. For millions of people, it’s a regular part of the dining experience, social and sports events, celebrations, and milestones. Alcohol plays a key role in many religious traditions. And the alcoholic beverage industry is a major economic force, responsible for more than $250 billion in sales annually in the US.

But there are many downsides to drinking: some are likely familiar (spoiler alert: it’s not great for your liver) while others are less well appreciated. And concerns about the risks of even moderate drinking are on the rise.

The negative effects of alcohol

Here are some of the most common problems associated with alcohol consumption (especially if excessive):

• liver disease, including cirrhosis and life-threatening liver failure requiring a liver transplant
• a higher risk of high blood pressure, heart failure, and dementia
• an increased risk of cancer (more on this below)
• a higher risk of injury, especially from drunk driving and falls (homicides and suicides are also often alcohol-related)
• lapses in judgment — for example, people who are drunk may engage in risky sexual behavior or use other drugs
• an increased risk of depression, anxiety, and addiction: these problems may impact one’s ability to establish and maintain social relationships and employment
• fetal alcohol syndrome: alcohol can damage a baby’s developing brain and cause other developmental abnormalities
• alcohol poisoning: many people don’t realize that if you drink enough alcohol over a short period of time, it can be fatal.

Heavy drinking can also cause problems well beyond the health of the drinker — it can damage important relationships. It’s all too common that problem drinking disrupts bonds with a spouse, family members, friends, coworkers, or employers.

Alcohol and cancer: A growing concern

In recent decades, a number of studies have linked drinking to higher rates of cancer, including cancers involving the

• liver
• colon
• breast
• mouth
• throat and esophagus.

In many cases, even moderate drinking (defined below) appears to increase risk. Despite this, less than half of the US public is aware of any alcohol-cancer connection. That’s why the Surgeon General issued an advisory in January 2025 recommending that alcoholic beverages carry new labels warning of the alcohol-cancer link and highlighting that no safe low level of alcohol consumption has been established. Changing the labels as suggested by the Surgeon General will require congressional action that may never happen.

Current alcoholic beverage labels in the US warn of the risks of driving under the influence of alcohol, adverse effects on general health, and risks for a developing fetus — but there’s no mention of cancer.

Are there any health benefits to drinking alcohol?

Alcohol has long been considered a “social lubricant” because drinking may encourage social interaction. Having a drink while getting together with family or friends is often part of many special occasions.

And not so long ago there was general consensus that drinking in moderation also came with health advantages, including a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. More recently, this belief has been called into question.

Even among the positive studies, potential health benefits are often quite small. In addition, alcohol may reduce the risk of one condition (such as cardiovascular disease) while increasing the risk of another (such as cancer). So it’s hard to predict who might actually benefit and who may be harmed more than helped by alcohol consumption. And the balance of risk and benefit likely varies from person to person, based on individual factors such as genetics and lifestyle factors.

Is drinking some alcohol better than drinking none?

A number of studies suggest the answer may be yes. For example, a 2018 study found that light drinkers (those consuming one to three drinks per week) had lower rates of cancer or death than those drinking less than one drink per week or none at all.

More recent studies (all published in 2023) came to similar conclusions. For example:

• A study of nearly a million people followed for more than 12 years found that abstainers had higher rates of death and chronic disease (including cardiovascular disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and chronic lung disease) than light or moderate drinkers.
• Researchers reporting on more than half a million people found that nondrinkers had higher rates of death than moderate drinkers.
• An analysis combining findings from 22 prior studies concluded that people who drank wine had lower rates of cardiovascular disease and related death than those who did not.

By contrast, another 2023 study found similar rates of death between nondrinkers and light to moderate drinkers.

It’s worth noting that current guidelines advise against drinking alcohol as a way to improve health.

How much alcohol is too much?

The answer to this important question has varied over time, but current US guidelines recommend that men who drink should limit intake to two drinks/day or less and women who drink should have no more than one drink/day. The definitions for a drink in the US are the common serving sizes for beer (12 ounces), wine (5 ounces), or distilled spirits/hard liquor (1.5 ounces).

A number of experts have recommended revision of the guidelines toward lower amounts, as more studies have linked even moderate alcohol consumption to health risks. Predictably, the alcoholic beverage industry opposes more restrictive guidelines.

Of course, no one needs to wait for new guidelines or warning labels to curb their drinking. Many are exploring ways to cut back, including the Dry January Challenge or alcohol-free drinks.

What we don’t know: The significant limitations of alcohol-related health research

Nearly all large studies regarding alcohol’s impact on health assess associations, not causation. So a higher rate of certain cancers may be associated with more alcohol consumption, but that doesn’t prove alcohol caused the cancer.

In addition, most rely on self-reporting that may be inaccurate, do not analyze binge drinking, do not assess alcohol consumption over a lifetime, or do not account for the fact that some study subjects may change their alcohol consumption due to alcohol-related health problems. These limitations make it hard to know how much to rely on studies that find health risks (or benefits) to alcohol consumption.

The bottom line

Assessing the risks and benefits of alcohol consumption remains an active area of research that may lead to major changes in official guidelines or warning labels.

But here’s one thing that hasn’t changed: many people like to drink. Even with more restrictive guidelines or new warning labels, it’s likely that plenty of folks will accept the risks of drinking alcohol. Still, it’s important to know what those risks are.

So, stay tuned. You can expect to hear about more research, debate, and controversy in the near future regarding the potential risks and benefits of drinking, and how much — if any — is ideal.

About the Author

Robert H. Shmerling, MD, Senior Faculty Editor, Harvard Health Publishing; Editorial Advisory Board Member, Harvard Health Publishing

Dr. Robert H. Shmerling is the former clinical chief of the division of rheumatology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), and is a current member of the corresponding faculty in medicine at Harvard Medical School. … See Full Bio View all posts by Robert H. Shmerling, MD

Looking for gifts to give or donate this year? Climate-conscious gifts come in many guises. They may directly support our environment, for example, or aim to reduce fossil fuel use and electronic, textile, and food waste. Or they might offer enjoyable, creative ways to connect, reuse, and recycle — and possibly even regift.

“Our purchases and choices impact our climate and planet,” notes Dr. Wynne Armand, a physician and associate director of the Massachusetts General Hospital Center for the Environment and Health. Small steps like these do help, she says, even when the complex issues of climate change leading to health-compromising pollution, extreme weather, and a stressed planet feel so large and overwhelming.

“Unquestionably, we need bold, strong leaders to seek policy changes that address these problems at a systems level. But, as individuals we can make a difference through small steps,” says Dr. Armand. “Our choices help drive cultural and market shifts that hopefully push our neighbors, businesses, and policy leaders in the right direction.”

Four climate-conscious principles for gifting

• Channel the 5 Rs. Refuse, reduce, reuse, repurpose, and only then recycle. Say no to excess. Comic sections from print newspapers or beautiful images from last year’s calendars or magazines make great envelopes and gift wrap. If you’re choosing clothes, consider buying upcycled clothing or at resale shops, as appropriate.
• Beware of greenwashing. Eco-consciousness is big business, and the benefits of what you buy may be questionable. If you have a small lawn that needs infrequent maintenance, says Dr. Armand, keeping a trusty (albeit gas-fueled) mower could be a better choice for the planet than buying an electric mower, when factoring in upstream costs of natural resources and the carbon footprint required to manufacture and ship the new — and toss out the not-so-old. (Alternatively, maybe it’s time to replant that lawn with wildflowers and vegetables?)
• Skip what’s not needed. A new backpack crafted from water bottles? Another sweater to add to a closetful? If there’s no apparent need, think twice about purchases.
• Double down on experiences and connection. Think concert tickets, museum passes, or energetic options like rock-climbing gym passes and outdoor skills classes. “Gifts of experience are great, especially for people who already have all they need. If you buy for two or try a skills swap you also get to enjoy that time together,” says Dr. Armand.

25 climate-conscious gifts

Below are 25 suggestions for climate-conscious giving intended to work with many budgets.

Small but mighty climate-conscious gifts

1. Soft, warm sweaters, thick socks, or puffer vests can help people turn down the heat, saving energy resources and money.

2. Rechargeable batteries reduce materials and packaging waste.

3. An electric kettle, induction hot plate, or toaster oven can help limit indoor pollutants from gas stoves.

4. Perfectly Good Food: A Totally Achievable Zero Waste Approach to Home Cooking aims to pare back food waste and is available online.

5. Shop local artisans and craft fairs rather than buying online.

6. Plants brighten any room and help scrub the air: choose easy-care varieties, such as succulents, colorful coleus, and some herbs.

7. Protect the natural world: birds, bees, and other insects could use your help. Consider a small bird feeder that attaches to a window, a bee house, gardening tools, or seeds for a pollinator garden of colorful flowers.

8. Donate to national or worldwide climate or environmental organizations, local green spaces, and local conservation groups.

9. Gift green bonds for companies that support renewable energy — do your research, though, because greenwashing can be an issue.

10. Secret gifter-giftee swaps with large groups save sanity and throttle back waste.

Bigger splurges on climate-conscious gifts

11. When appliances reach the end of useful life, consider replacing gas stoves, water heaters, washers, dryers, and similar items with electric versions.

12. Plan a week of nearby tours and events with friends or family instead of flights and faraway travel.

13. Gift clothes and tools to enjoy the natural world: for example, warm, waterproof clothing and hiking boots, cross-country skis or skates, good binoculars for bird-watching.

14. Composters (or a weekly composting service subscription) recycle food scraps and organic waste into soil-enriching “black gold.”

15. Electric bikes may be a boon if they reduce reliance on vehicles using fossil fuels.

16. Help fund energy-efficient heat pumps or renewable solar energy.

17. Substantial donations and sustaining donor gifts to climate-conscious organizations can help in many ways.

No-cost climate-conscious gifts

18. Offer to gather information on big-ticket items in the big splurges section, including state and federal rebates and 0% loans for heat pumps, energy-efficient furnaces, solar panels, and energy-efficient appliances.

19. Teach a skill one-on-one, such as home repair, skating, chess, training for a mud run, knitting, cooking, orienteering, or gardening, or organize skills swaps with friends.

20. Gift the human power needed to replant portions of a lawn with vegetables or pollinator plants, or make a rain garden (note: automatic download) to help divert storm water.

21. Combine a no-cost reminder of the environmental benefits of no-mow May and leave the leaves campaigns with an offer to help peel back these layers come spring.

22. Friends often want to gift one another — costly generosity that can prompt last-minute candle-buying. As an alternative, gather a small group of friends for a clothing, accessories, and candle swap of new, never-took-the-price-tag-off, nearly new, and well-loved items.

23. Offer a DIY nature or bird walk for two. Try the free Pl@ntnet and Merlin apps if you can’t tell a pin oak from a petunia or a robin from a California condor.

24. If you buy for a ton of people, buy in bulk and figure out how to parcel it out in more sustainable packaging.

25. Make dinner, fudge, or another treat with friends — not completely free, but always a great way to gather your community.

About the Author

Francesca Coltrera, Editor, Harvard Health Blog

Francesca Coltrera is editor of the Harvard Health Blog, and associate editor of multimedia content for Harvard Health Publishing. She is an award-winning medical writer and co-author of Living Through Breast Cancer and The Breast Cancer … See Full Bio View all posts by Francesca Coltrera

About the Reviewer

Howard E. LeWine, MD, Chief Medical Editor, Harvard Health Publishing; Editorial Advisory Board Member, Harvard Health Publishing

Dr. Howard LeWine is a practicing internist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Chief Medical Editor at Harvard Health Publishing, and editor in chief of Harvard Men’s Health Watch. See Full Bio View all posts by Howard E. LeWine, MD

By the time boys are 8 or 10, they’re steeped in Marvel action heroes with bulging, oversized muscles and rock-hard abs. By adolescence, they’re deluged with social media streams of bulked-up male bodies.

The underlying messages about power and worth prompt many boys to worry and wonder about how to measure up. Sometimes, negative thoughts and concerns even interfere with daily life, a mental health issue known body dysmorphic disorder, or body dysmorphia. The most common form of this in boys is muscle dysmorphia.

What is muscle dysmorphia?

Muscle dysmorphia is marked by preoccupation with a muscular and lean physique. While the more extreme behaviors that define this disorder appear only in a small percentage of boys and young men, it may color the mindset of many more.

Nearly a quarter of boys and young men engage in some type of muscle-building behaviors. “About 60% of young boys in the United States mention changing their diet to become more muscular,” says Dr. Gabriela Vargas, director of the Young Men’s Health website at Boston Children’s Hospital. “While that may not meet the diagnostic criteria of muscle dysmorphia disorder, it’s impacting a lot of young men.”

“There’s a social norm that equates muscularity with masculinity,” Dr. Vargas adds. “Even Halloween costumes for 4- and 5-year-old boys now have padding for six-pack abs. There’s constant messaging that this is what their bodies should look like.”

Does body dysmorphic disorder differ in boys and girls?

Long believed to be the domain of girls, body dysmorphia can take the form of eating disorders such as anorexia or bulimia. Technically, muscle dysmorphia is not an eating disorder. But it is far more pervasive in males — and insidious.

“The common notion is that body dysmorphia just affects girls and isn’t a male issue,” Dr. Vargas says. “Because of that, these unhealthy behaviors in boys often go overlooked.”

What are the signs of body dysmorphia in boys?

Parents may have a tough time discerning whether their son is merely being a teen or veering into dangerous territory. Dr. Vargas advises parents to look for these red flags:

• Marked change in physical routines, such as going from working out once a day to spending hours working out every day.
• Following regimented workouts or meals, including limiting the foods they’re eating or concentrating heavily on high-protein options.
• Disrupting normal activities, such as spending time with friends, to work out instead.
• Obsessively taking photos of their muscles or abdomen to track “improvement.”
• Weighing himself multiple times a day.
• Dressing to highlight a more muscular physique, or wearing baggier clothes to hide their physique because they don’t think it’s good enough.

“Nearly everyone has been on a diet,” Dr. Vargas says. “The difference with this is persistence — they don’t just try it for a week and then decide it’s not for them. These boys are doing this for weeks to months, and they’re not flexible in changing their behaviors.”

What are the health dangers of muscle dysmorphia in boys?

Extreme behaviors can pose physical and mental health risks.

For example, unregulated protein powders and supplements boys turn to in hopes of quickly bulking up muscles may be adulterated with stimulants or even anabolic steroids. “With that comes an increased risk of stroke, heart palpitations, high blood pressure, and liver injury,” notes Dr. Vargas.

Some boys also attempt to gain muscle through a “bulk and cut” regimen, with periods of rapid weight gain followed by periods of extreme calorie limitation. This can affect long-term muscle and bone development and lead to irregular heartbeat and lower testosterone levels.

“Even in a best-case scenario, eating too much protein can lead to a lot of intestinal distress, such as diarrhea, or to kidney injury, since our kidneys are not meant to filter out excessive amounts of protein,” Dr. Vargas says.

The psychological fallout can also be dramatic. Depression and suicidal thoughts are more common in people who are malnourished, which may occur when boys drastically cut calories or neglect entire food groups. Additionally, as they try to achieve unrealistic ideals, they may constantly feel like they’re not good enough.

How can parents encourage a healthy body image in boys?

These tips can help:

• Gather for family meals. Schedules can be tricky. Yet considerable research shows physical and mental health benefits flow from sitting down together for meals, including a greater likelihood of children being an appropriate weight for their body type.
• Don’t comment on body shape or size. “It’s a lot easier said than done, but this means your own body, your child’s, or others in the community,” says Dr. Vargas.
• Frame nutrition and exercise as meaningful for health. When you talk with your son about what you eat or your exercise routine, don’t tie hoped-for results to body shape or size.
• Communicate openly. “If your son says he wants to exercise more or increase his protein intake, ask why — for his overall health, or a specific body ideal?”
• Don’t buy protein supplements. It’s harder for boys to obtain them when parents won’t allow them in the house. “One alternative is to talk with your son’s primary care doctor or a dietitian, who can be a great resource on how to get protein through regular foods,” Dr. Vargas says.

About the Author

Maureen Salamon, Executive Editor, Harvard Women's Health Watch

Maureen Salamon is executive editor of Harvard Women’s Health Watch. She began her career as a newspaper reporter and later covered health and medicine for a wide variety of websites, magazines, and hospitals. Her work has … See Full Bio View all posts by Maureen Salamon

About the Reviewer

Howard E. LeWine, MD, Chief Medical Editor, Harvard Health Publishing; Editorial Advisory Board Member, Harvard Health Publishing

Dr. Howard LeWine is a practicing internist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Chief Medical Editor at Harvard Health Publishing, and editor in chief of Harvard Men’s Health Watch. See Full Bio View all posts by Howard E. LeWine, MD

It used to be that radiation therapy for prostate cancer involved weeks or months of repeat visits to a clinic for treatment. Today that’s not necessarily true. Instead of giving small doses (called fractions) per session until the full plan is completed, radiation delivery is moving toward high-dose fractions that can be given with fewer sessions over shorter durations.

This “hypofractionated” strategy is more convenient for patients, and mounting evidence shows it can be accomplished safely. With one technology called stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), patients can finish their treatment plans within a week, as opposed to a month or more. Several devices are available to deliver hypofractionated therapy, so patients may also hear it referred to as CyberKnife or by other brand names.

An SBRT session takes about 20 to 30 minutes, and the experience is similar to receiving an x-ray. Often, doctors will first insert small metal pellets shaped like grains of rice into the prostate gland. Called fiducials, these pellets function as markers that help doctors target the tumor more precisely, so that radiation beams avoid healthy tissue. During treatment, a patient lies still while the radiation-delivery machine rotates around his body, administering the therapy.

How good is SBRT at controlling prostate cancer? Results from a randomized controlled clinical trial show that SBRT and conventional radiotherapy offer the same long-term benefits.

How the study was conducted

The trial enrolled 874 men with localized prostate cancer, meaning cancer that is still confined to the prostate gland. The men ranged between 65 and 74 years in age, and all of them had prostate cancer with a low or intermediate risk of further progression. The study randomized each of the men to one of two groups:

• Treatment group: The 433 men in this group each got SBRT at the same daily dose. The treatment plan was completed after five visits given over a span of one to two weeks.
• Control group: The 441 men in this group got conventional radiotherapy over durations ranging from four to 7.5 weeks.

None of the men received additional hormonal therapy, which is a treatment that blocks the prostate cancer–promoting effects of testosterone.

What the study showed

After a median duration of 74 months (roughly six years), the research found little difference in cancer outcomes. Among men in the treatment group, 26 developed visibly recurring prostate cancer, or a spike in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels suggesting that newly-forming tumors were somewhere in the body (this is called a biochemical recurrence). By contrast, 36 men from the control group developed visible cancer or biochemical recurrence. Put another way, 95.8% of men from the SBRT group — and 94.6% of men in the control group — were still free of prostate cancer.

A word of caution

Earlier results published two years into the same study showed higher rates of genitourinary side effects among the SBRT-treated men. Typical genitourinary side effects include inflammatory reactions that increase pain during urination, or that can make men want to urinate more often. Some men develop incontinence or scar tissues that make urination more difficult. In all, 12% of men in the SBRT group experienced genitourinary side effects at two years, compared to 7% of the control subjects.

“Interestingly, patients who were treated with CyberKnife appeared to have lower significant toxicity at two years compared with those treated on other platforms,” said Dr. Nima Aghdam, a radiation oncologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and an instructor of radiation oncology at Harvard Medical School. By five years, the differences in side effects between men treated with SBRT or conventional radiation had disappeared.

The authors advised that men might consider conventional radiation instead of SBRT if they have existing urinary problems before being treated for cancer. Patients with baseline urinary problems are “more likely to have long-term toxic effects,” the authors wrote, adding that the new findings should “allow for better patient selection for SBRT, and more careful counseling.”

“This is an important study that validates what’s becoming a standard practice,” said Dr. Marc Garnick, the Gorman Brothers Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and editor in chief of the Harvard Medical School Guide to Prostate Diseases. “The use of a five-day treatment schedule has been well received by patients who live long distances from a radiation facility, given that treatment can be completed during the weekdays of a single week. As with any cancer treatment choice, the selection of the appropriate patient is crucial to minimize any potential side effects, and this can only be done after a careful consideration of the patient’s other medical conditions.”

“This elegant study will put to rest any questions regarding the validity of SBRT as a standard-of-care option for many patients with prostate cancer,” Dr. Aghdam added. “Importantly in this trial, we see excellent outcomes for many patients who were treated with radiation alone. As this approach gains broad acceptance in radiation oncology practices, it remains critical to carefully consider each patient based on their baseline characteristics, and employ the highest level of quality assurance in delivering large doses of radiation in fewer fractions. As the overall duration of radiation therapy gets shorter, every single treatment becomes that much more important.”

About the Author

Charlie Schmidt, Editor, Harvard Medical School Annual Report on Prostate Diseases

Charlie Schmidt is an award-winning freelance science writer based in Portland, Maine. In addition to writing for Harvard Health Publishing, Charlie has written for Science magazine, the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Environmental Health Perspectives, … See Full Bio View all posts by Charlie Schmidt

About the Reviewer

Marc B. Garnick, MD, Editor in Chief, Harvard Medical School Annual Report on Prostate Diseases; Editorial Advisory Board Member, Harvard Health Publishing

Dr. Marc B. Garnick is an internationally renowned expert in medical oncology and urologic cancer. A clinical professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, he also maintains an active clinical practice at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical … See Full Bio View all posts by Marc B. Garnick, MD

Metastatic prostate cancer can progress in different ways. In some men the disease advances rapidly, while other men have slower-growing cancer and a better prognosis. Researchers are developing various tools for predicting how fast prostate cancer might progress. Among the most promising are assays that count circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in blood samples.

Prostate cancer spreads by shedding CTCs into the bloodstream, so higher counts in blood generally reflect worse disease. Sometimes referred to as a liquid biopsy, the CTC assay can help doctors decide if patients should get standard or more aggressive treatment. Just one CTC assay is currently on the market for prostate cancer. Called CellSearch, its use is so far limited to men with late-stage metastatic cancer for whom hormonal therapies are no longer effective.

Using CTC data

Hormonal therapies block testosterone, a hormone that drives prostate tumors to grow. Research shows that high CTC counts predict poorer survival and faster disease progression among patients with metastatic prostate cancer who become resistant to this form of treatment. But new research shows CTC counts are also predictive for early-stage metastatic prostate cancer that still responds to hormonal therapy.

Why is that important? Because the earlier doctors can predict a cancer’s trajectory, the better their ability to select patients who could benefit from more powerful (and potentially more aggressive) drug combinations or a clinical trial. Conversely, men who are older or frail might be treated less aggressively if doctors had better insights into their prognosis.

How the study was done

The investigators collected blood samples from 503 newly-diagnosed patients with hormonally-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer who had enrolled in a clinical trial with experimental hormonal therapies. The team collected baseline samples at trial registration, and then another set of samples after the treatments were no longer working. CTC counts were divided in three categories:

• more than 5 CTCs per 7.5 milliliters (mLs) of blood
• between 1 and 4 CTCs per 7.5 mLs of blood
• zero CTCs per 7.5 mLs of blood.

What the research showed

Results showed that men with higher baseline CTC counts fared worse regardless of which cancer drugs they were taking. Median survival for men with 5 or more CTCs per sample was 27.9 months compared to 56.2 months in men with 1 to 4 CTCs. There weren’t enough patient deaths among those with 0 CTCs to calculate a survival rate.

Similarly, higher CTC counts predicted faster onset of resistance to hormonal therapy: 11.3 months for men in the highest CTC category, compared to 20.7 months and 59 months for men with 1 to 4 and zero CTCs respectively. Importantly, higher CTC counts correlated with measures of prostate cancer severity, including PSA levels, numbers of metastases in bone, and other indicators.

Observations and comments

“This research emphasizes the continued emergence of CTCs in helping to determine outcomes and potentially treatment options for men with metastatic prostate cancer,” said Dr. Marc Garnick, the Gorman Brothers Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and editor in chief of the Harvard Medical School Guide to Prostate Diseases.

“Still to be determined is how this type of testing compares with more traditional evaluations of disease advancement, such as x-rays, bone scans, and other types of imaging. Ready access to cancer cells in blood that, in turn, eliminate the need for more invasive biopsy procedures of metastatic deposits will be a welcome addition — especially if future studies show that CTCs inform more precise treatment choices.”

Dr. David Einstein, a medical oncologist specializing in genitourinary cancers at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and assistant professor at Harvard Medical School, agreed with that assessment. “But the Holy Grail is finding predictive biomarkers [like CTCs] that tell you if patients will or will not benefit from particular treatments,” he added. “Answering these types of questions requires randomized clinical trials.”

About the Author

Charlie Schmidt, Editor, Harvard Medical School Annual Report on Prostate Diseases

Charlie Schmidt is an award-winning freelance science writer based in Portland, Maine. In addition to writing for Harvard Health Publishing, Charlie has written for Science magazine, the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Environmental Health Perspectives, … See Full Bio View all posts by Charlie Schmidt

About the Reviewer

Marc B. Garnick, MD, Editor in Chief, Harvard Medical School Annual Report on Prostate Diseases; Editorial Advisory Board Member, Harvard Health Publishing

Dr. Marc B. Garnick is an internationally renowned expert in medical oncology and urologic cancer. A clinical professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, he also maintains an active clinical practice at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical … See Full Bio View all posts by Marc B. Garnick, MD

Several evenings a week, as Tyler VanderWeele gathers around the dinner table with his wife and two young kids, the family deliberately pauses during the meal to do something simple but profound. Each member shares several things for which they’re grateful — an act that VanderWeele, co-director of the Initiative on Health, Spirituality, and Religion at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, feels changes his family dynamic for the better.

“I do think it makes a difference and can be a very powerful practice,” he says. “Even on those bad days where life seems difficult, that effort is worthwhile.”

Gratitude, health, and longevity

How can the power of gratitude affect our lives? Recent research has pointed to gratitude’s myriad positive health effects, including greater emotional and social well-being, better sleep quality, lower depression risks, and favorable markers of cardiovascular health. Now, new data from the long-term Nurses’ Health Study shows that it may extend lives.

“Gratitude has been one of the most widely studied activities contributing to well-being, but we couldn’t find a single prior study that looked at its effects on mortality and longevity, much to our surprise,” says VanderWeele, co-author of the new research.

What did the study look at?

Published July 2024 in JAMA Psychiatry, the new study drew on data from 49,275 women enrolled in the Nurses’ Health Study. Their average age was 79. In 2016, participants completed a six-item gratitude questionnaire in which they ranked their agreement with statements such as, “I have so much in life to be thankful for,” and “If I had to list everything I felt grateful for, it would be a very long list.”

Four years later, researchers combed through participants’ medical records to determine who had died. There were 4,608 deaths from all causes, as well as from specific causes such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, respiratory diseases, neurodegenerative disease, infection, and injury. Deaths from cardiovascular disease — a top killer of women and men in the United States — were the most common cause.

What did the researchers find?

Participants with gratitude scores in the highest third at the study’s start had a 9% lower risk of dying over the following four years than participants who scored in the bottom third. This did not change after controlling for physical health, economic circumstances, and other aspects of mental health and well-being. Gratitude seemed to help protect participants from every cause of death studied — including cardiovascular disease.

But what does this actually mean?

“A 9% reduction in mortality risk is meaningful, but not huge,” VanderWeele says. “But what’s remarkable about gratitude is that just about anyone can practice it. Anyone can recognize what’s around them and express thanks to others for what’s good in their life.”

While the study couldn’t pinpoint why gratitude is associated with longer life, VanderWeele believes several factors may contribute.

“We know that gratitude makes people feel happier. That in itself has a small effect on mortality risk,” he says. “Practicing gratitude may also make someone a bit more motivated to take care of their health. Maybe they’re more likely to show up for medical appointments or exercise. It may also help with relationships and social support, which we know contribute to health.”

What are the study’s limitations and strengths?

The study was observational. This means it can’t prove that gratitude helps people live longer — only that an association exists. And the particular sample of people analyzed is both the biggest strength and limitation of the research, VanderWeele says. All were older female nurses with high socioeconomic status. The vast majority were white.

“Does the longevity effect extend to men, to those who are younger, and to those with lower socioeconomic resources?” VanderWeele asks. “Those are all open questions.”

On the plus side, he says, the study sample’s large size is one of its biggest strengths. So is the extensive data gathered on potential confounding factors such as participants’ physical health, social characteristics, and other aspects of psychological well-being.

“Between the quality of the data and the size of the sample, we were able to provide reasonable evidence for this modest longevity effect,” he says.

Try this: Six questions to evoke gratitude

Not feeling especially grateful today? You have the power to change that. Asking yourself certain questions can evoke gratitude, such as

• What happened today that was good?
• What am I taking for granted that I can be thankful for?
• Which people in my life am I grateful for?
• What is the last book I read or movie, show, or social media clip I saw that I really appreciated, and why?
• What am I most looking forward to this week, month, and year, and why?
• What is the kindest thing someone has said or done lately?

Similarly, a few simple actions can infuse gratitude into your days. Try VanderWeele’s family routine of regularly expressing gratitude around the dinner table. Another well-known practice — that’s perhaps becoming forgotten in this digital age — is penning thank-you notes.

“I do think writing a thank-you note or gratitude letter gets your mind to dwell on something positive for a longer period, to think more deeply about it, because you have to put it not just in words, but in writing,” VanderWeele says. “It also deepens the relationship and builds that bond.”

One less-recognized but valuable gratitude practice is called a “savoring exercise,” which builds on aspects of mindfulness. All that’s required is “pausing, looking around you, and taking in and enjoying everything that’s good in your current setting,” VanderWeele says. “It’s not a big leap to go from recognizing the good to expressing gratitude for what you have.”

About the Author

Maureen Salamon, Executive Editor, Harvard Women's Health Watch

Maureen Salamon is executive editor of Harvard Women’s Health Watch. She began her career as a newspaper reporter and later covered health and medicine for a wide variety of websites, magazines, and hospitals. Her work has … See Full Bio View all posts by Maureen Salamon

About the Reviewer

Howard E. LeWine, MD, Chief Medical Editor, Harvard Health Publishing; Editorial Advisory Board Member, Harvard Health Publishing

Dr. Howard LeWine is a practicing internist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Chief Medical Editor at Harvard Health Publishing, and editor in chief of Harvard Men’s Health Watch. See Full Bio View all posts by Howard E. LeWine, MD

Quick health quiz: how bad is inflammation for your body?

You’re forgiven if you think inflammation is very bad. News sources everywhere will tell you it contributes to the top causes of death worldwide. Heart disease, stroke, dementia, and cancer all have been linked to chronic inflammation. And that’s just the short list. So, what can you do to reduce inflammation in your body?

Good question! Before we get to the answers, though, let’s review what inflammation is — and isn’t.

Inflammation 101

Misconceptions abound about inflammation. One standard definition describes inflammation as the body’s response to an injury, allergy, or infection, causing redness, warmth, pain, swelling, and limitation of function. That’s right if we’re talking about a splinter in your finger, bacterial pneumonia, or the rash of poison ivy. But it’s only part of the story, because there’s more than one type of inflammation:

• Acute inflammation rears up suddenly, lasts days to weeks, and then settles down once the cause, such as an injury or infection, is under control. Generally, acute inflammation is a reaction that attempts to restore the health of the affected area. That’s the type described in the definition above.
• Chronic inflammation is quite different. It can develop for no medically apparent reason, last a lifetime, and cause harm rather than healing. This type of inflammation is often linked with chronic disease, such as:
• • excess weight
  • diabetes
  • cardiovascular disease, including heart attacks and stroke
  • certain infections, such as hepatitis C
  • autoimmune disease
  • cancer
  • stress, whether psychological or physical.

Which cells are involved in inflammation?

The cells involved with both types of inflammation are part of the body’s immune system. That makes sense, because the immune system defends the body from attacks of all kinds.

Depending on the duration, location, and cause of trouble, a variety of immune cells, such as neutrophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages, rush in to create inflammation. Each type of cell has its own particular role to play, including attacking foreign invaders, creating antibodies, and removing dead cells.

4 inflammation myths and misconceptions

Inflammation is the root cause of most modern illness.

Not so fast. Yes, a number of chronic diseases are accompanied by inflammation. In many cases, controlling that inflammation is an important part of treatment. And it’s true that unchecked inflammation contributes to long-term health problems.

But inflammation is not the direct cause of most chronic diseases. For example, blood vessel inflammation occurs with atherosclerosis. Yet we don’t know whether chronic inflammation caused this, or whether the key contributors were standard risk factors (such as high cholesterol, diabetes, and smoking — all of which cause inflammation).

You know when you’re inflamed.

True for some conditions. People with rheumatoid arthritis, for example, know when their joints are inflamed because they experience more pain, swelling, and stiffness. But the type of inflammation seen in obesity, diabetes, or cardiovascular disease, for example, causes no specific symptoms. Sure, fatigue, brain fog, headaches, and other symptoms are sometimes attributed to inflammation. But plenty of people have those symptoms without inflammation.

Controlling chronic inflammation would eliminate most chronic disease.

Not so. Effective treatments typically target the cause of inflammation, rather than just suppressing inflammation itself. For example, a person with rheumatoid arthritis may take steroids or other anti-inflammatory medicines to reduce their symptoms. But to avoid permanent joint damage, they also take a medicine like methotrexate to treat the underlying condition that’s causing inflammation.

Anti-inflammatory diets or certain foods (blueberries! kale! garlic!) prevent disease by suppressing inflammation.

While it’s true that some foods and diets are healthier than others, it’s not clear their benefits are due to reducing inflammation. Switching from a typical Western diet to an “anti-inflammatory diet” (such as the Mediterranean diet) improves health in multiple ways. Reducing inflammation is just one of many possible mechanisms.

The bottom line

Inflammation isn’t a lone villain cutting short millions of lives each year. The truth is, even if you could completely eliminate inflammation — sorry, not possible — you wouldn’t want to. Among other problems, quashing inflammation would leave you unable to mount an effective response to infections, allergens, toxins or injuries.

Inflammation is complicated. Acute inflammation is your body’s natural, usually helpful response to injury, infection, or other dangers. But it sometimes sparks problems of its own or spins out of control. We need to better understand what causes inflammation and what prompts it to become chronic. Then we can treat an underlying cause, instead of assigning the blame for every illness to inflammation or hoping that eating individual foods will reduce it.

There’s no quick or simple fix for unhealthy inflammation. To reduce it, we need to detect, prevent, and treat its underlying causes. Yet there is good news. Most often, inflammation exists in your body for good reason and does what it’s supposed to do. And when it is causing trouble, you can take steps to improve the situation.

About the Author

Robert H. Shmerling, MD, Senior Faculty Editor, Harvard Health Publishing; Editorial Advisory Board Member, Harvard Health Publishing

Dr. Robert H. Shmerling is the former clinical chief of the division of rheumatology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), and is a current member of the corresponding faculty in medicine at Harvard Medical School. … See Full Bio View all posts by Robert H. Shmerling, MD

Most men over 50 will develop an enlarged prostate. Also called benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), this bothersome condition makes it hard to urinate and can eventually lead to other problems, such as infections, kidney stones, and bladder damage, if left untreated. Many different BPH therapies are available, including medications and various types of surgery.

One of the newer surgical options, called aquablation, trims excess prostate tissues with highly pressurized jets of saline. Doctors perform aquablation in the operating room while looking at the prostate gland on an ultrasound machine. Patients are put under general anesthesia, so they don’t feel any pain during the procedure.

Men typically have to urinate through a catheter for about 24 hours after surgery until swelling of the urethra (the tube through which urine flows out of the bladder) subsides. Aquablation is gaining in popularity — in part because, unlike other more traditional BPH treatments, it can preserve normal ejaculation.

In September, researchers published a study showing that improvements in urinary function from aquablation were still holding up after five years.

Results of data analysis

The study assessed long-term data from two clinical trials. The first, called the WATER trial (for Waterjet Ablation Therapy for Endoscopic Resection of Prostate Tissue) launched in 2015 and enrolled 116 men with prostates ranging up to 80 cubic centimeters. The second trial, WATER II, launched in 2017 and enrolled 101 men with prostates ranging between 80 and 150 cubic centimeters. (Normal prostates range from 25 to 30 cubic centimeters in size.) Enrolled patients had a median age of 66 in the WATER study and 68 in WATER II. In addition, 92% of men in the WATER trial were sexually active, as were 75% of the men in WATER II.

Both clinical trials used the so-called International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) to measure treatment-related improvements in urinary functioning and quality of life. Calculated based on how patients rate their symptoms on a standardized questionnaire, IPSS scores fall into three categories: mild symptom scores range from 1 to 7; intermediate symptom scores range from 8 to 18; and scores greater than 19 indicate severe symptoms.

When they first enrolled in the trials, men in the WATER and WATER II studies reported average IPSS scores of 22.9 and 23.3 respectively. Five years later, the average respective scores were much lower: 7.0 and 6.8. The average length of hospital stay was 1.4 days in the WATER group and 1.6 days for the WATER II group. Only 1% of men were taking BPH medications after five years, and fewer than 5% had been surgically re-treated.

Another randomized control trial, WATER III, is currently underway in Europe. That trial compares aquablation with a more established type of BPH surgery, prostate enucleation, which uses a laser to remove obstructing tissues. Six-month data reported in 2023 showed that men in either group had comparable symptom improvements.

However, 98% of men in the prostate enucleation group had ejaculatory dysfunction. That side effect is caused by damage to delicate tissues around the bladder neck that propel semen out of the body. Semen therefore flows back into the bladder, a condition called retrograde ejaculation. None of the men in the aquablation group reported ejaculatory problems.

A word of caution

Aquablation can result in extended bleeding, cautions Dr. Heidi Rayala, an assistant professor of urology at Harvard Medical School and a member of the Harvard Medical School Guide to Prostate Diseases advisory board. That’s because unlike other types of surgery for BPH, including prostate enucleation, aquablation doesn’t cauterize tissues with heat. “I tell my patients to expect some blood in the urine for about four to six weeks after the procedure,” Dr. Rayala said.

Moreover, aquablation may be unsuitable for some men who take blood thinners to prevent blood from clotting, according to Dr. Rayala. Appropriate candidates for the surgery must be able to “safely discontinue anticoagulant medications during post-operative healing, given the bleeding risk,” Dr. Rayala said. Still, aquablation is an excellent option for most men, Dr. Rayala said, especially those with medium to large prostates “who want a durable solution with a lower risk of sexual side effects.”

“These early results are encouraging, but limited by a relatively small number of patients,” said Dr. Marc Garnick, the Gorman Brothers Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and editor in chief of the Harvard Medical School Guide to Prostate Diseases. “Further evidence with a significantly larger number of patients and longer follow-up will help to support this new method of reducing prostate tissue as an important treatment option.”

About the Author

Charlie Schmidt, Editor, Harvard Medical School Annual Report on Prostate Diseases

Charlie Schmidt is an award-winning freelance science writer based in Portland, Maine. In addition to writing for Harvard Health Publishing, Charlie has written for Science magazine, the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Environmental Health Perspectives, … See Full Bio View all posts by Charlie Schmidt

About the Reviewer

Marc B. Garnick, MD, Editor in Chief, Harvard Medical School Annual Report on Prostate Diseases; Editorial Advisory Board Member, Harvard Health Publishing

Dr. Marc B. Garnick is an internationally renowned expert in medical oncology and urologic cancer. A clinical professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, he also maintains an active clinical practice at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical … See Full Bio View all posts by Marc B. Garnick, MD